Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carmiol, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cenko, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Review Essay: Weaving Sociocultural Change and Cognitive Development Together

Greenfield, Patricia Marks, Weaving Generations Together: Evolving Creativity in the Maya of Chiapas. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 2004. ISBN 1—930618—28—X (pbk)

Ana M. Carmiol

Clark University, USA, acarmiol{at}clarku.edu

Enila Cenko

Clark University, USA, ecenko{at}clarku.edu

In Weaving Generations Together, Greenfield describes a long-term project spanning two generations of mothers teaching their daughters how to weave. The author considers the economic and social changes that took place in the Mayan village of Nabenchauk between the 1970s and the 1990s, and explains how they affected weaving apprenticeship and the creative and cognitive processes involved in it. We sympathize with this situated analysis of learning, creativity and cognition, and applaud Greenfield's unique contribution to the understanding of human development under shifting socioeconomic circumstances. At the same time, we highlight the need to enrich the author's account in two distinct ways: (1) by favoring a developmental perspective to the study of changes in practices and psychological phenomena that involves the analysis of processes of transformation and not only the description of differences observed across time; and (2) by specifying the relationship between cultural practices and internal processes. A call is also made to further the discussion about the assumptions that underlie the author's sociocultural approach.

Key Words: cognitive development • creativity • learning styles • sociocultural theory • weaving

References

  • Brazelton, T.B., Robey, J.S., & Collier, J.A. (1969). Infant development in the Zinacanteco Indians of Southern Mexico. Pediatrics, 44, 274—290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Childs, C.P., & Greenfield, P.M. (1980). Informal modes of learning and teaching: The case of Zinacanteco weaving. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in Cross-cultural Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 269—316). London: Academic Press.
  • Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993) A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Greenfield, P.M. (2000). Culture and universals: Integrating social and cognitive development. In L.P. Nucci, G.B. Saxe, & E. Turiel (Eds.), Culture, thought, and development (pp. 231—277). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Greenfield, P.M., Maynard, A.E., & Childs, C.P. (2000). History, culture, learning, and development. Cross-cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 34, 351—374.
  • Greenfield, P.M., Maynard, A.E., & Childs, C.P. (2003). Historical change, cultural learning, and cognitive representation in Zinacantec Maya children. Cognitive Development, 18, 455—487.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265—288.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Kreppner, K. (1997). Cultural psychology and the problem of exchange between individual and environment: Is there a common concept? Culture & Psychology, 3, 405—422.[Abstract]
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leontiev, A. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.
  • Lightfoot, C., & Valsiner, J. (1992). Parental belief systems under the influence: Social guidance of the construction of personal cultures. In I. Sigel, A. McGillicuddy-DeLisi, & J. Goodnow (Eds.), Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children (pp. 393—414). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Luria, A.R. (1971). Towards the problem of the historical nature of psychological processes. International Journal of Psychology, 6, 259—272.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Maynard, A.E., & Greenfield, P.M. (2003). Implicit cognitive development in cultural tools and children: Lessons from Maya Mexico. Cognitive Development, 18, 489—510.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Maynard, A.E., Greenfield, P.M., & Childs, C.P. (1999). Culture, history, biology, and body: Native and non-native acquisition of technological skill. Ethos, 27, 379—402.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Pérez-Campos, G. (2003). Debates in social theory—Tensions in sociocultural theorizing. Culture & Psychology, 9, 171—178.[Abstract]
  • Ratner, C. (1999). Three approaches to cultural psychology: A critique. Cultural Dynamics, 11, 7—31.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprentices in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Saxe, G.B. (1996). Studying cognitive development in sociocultural context: The development of a practice-based approach. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development (pp. 275—303). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Saxe, G.B., & Esmonde, I. (2005). Studying cognition in flux: A historical treatment of Fu in the shifting structure of Oksapmin mathematics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12, 171—225.[CrossRef]
  • Sawyer, K.R. (2002). Unresolved tensions in sociocultural theory: Analogies with contemporary sociological debates. Culture & Psychology, 8, 283—305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Valsiner, J., Branco, A., & Dantas, C. (1997). Co-construction of human development: Heterogeneity within parental belief orientations. In J. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children's internalization of values (pp. 283—304). New York: Wiley.

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 4, 500-512 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X07082808


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carmiol, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cenko, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?