|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Review Essay: Conceptualizing Metaphors versus Embodying the LanguageKövecses, Zoltán, Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge Universty Press, 2005. ISBN 0—521—84447—9 (hbk)
Carlos Cornejo
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, cca{at}puc.cl
The paper presents a review of Kövecses's book Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation (2005) advancing a more general critique to the cognitive linguistic view of metaphor. Kövecses addresses a pending problem for the cognitive linguistic approach, namely the observed variation both cross-culturally and within cultures in the use of metaphors. If, as predicted by cognitive linguistics, metaphorical expressions are bodily motivated, conceptual metaphors should be universals. Variation is also a problem for this theory. I argue that the problem reflects the incapacity of the theory to integrate bodily and social meanings. To solve this dilemma, three tenets of cognitive linguistics should be changed: the necessity to hypothesize conceptual structures between body and meaning; the framing of metaphor as a logical device rather than a psychological process; and the omission of the phenomenological experience when using metaphors. I conclude with a brief sketch of how a metaphor theory should work when changing those tenets.
Key Words: conceptual metaphor • embodiment • meaning construction • metaphor • microgenesis
References
- Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Cornejo, C. (2004). Who says what the words say? The problem of linguistic meaning in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 1, 5—28.
- Davidson, D. (2001). What metaphors mean. In D. Davidson (Ed.), Inquiries into truth and interpretation (2nd ed.; pp. 245—264). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1978.)
- Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
- Fermandois, E. (2003). Kontexte erzeugen: Zur Frage nach der Wahrheit von Metaphern. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 3, 427—442.
- Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
- Hörmann, H. (1976). Meinen und verstehen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
- Hörmann, H. (1986). Meaning and context: An introduction to the psychology of language. New York: Plenum.
- Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Quine, W.V.O. (1964). Two dogmas of empiricism. In W.V.O. Quine (Ed.), From a logical point of view (2nd ed.; pp. 20—46). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1951.)
- Richards, I.A. (1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.
- Rosenthal, V. (2004). Microgenesis, immediate experience and visual processes in reading. In A. Carsetti (Ed.), Seeing, thinking and knowing: Meaning and self-organization in visual cognition and thought (pp. 221—243). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
- Shanon, B. (1993). The representational and the presentational: An essay on cognition and the study of mind. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
- Werner, H. (1919). Die Ursprünge der Metapher. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
Culture & Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 4,
474-487 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X07082806
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
