Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hermans, H. J.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Clinical Diagnosis as a Multiplicity of Self-Positions: Challenging Social Representations Theory

Hubert J.M. Hermans

University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

This contribution is written as a challenge to Schmitz, Filippone and Edelman’s (2003) analysis of the clinical diagnosis ADHD from the perspective of social representations theory. The focus of the present article is on the implications of a clinical diagnosis for the organization and reorganization of the self. As an illustrative example, a client is presented who seemed to be ‘enslaved’ to the diagnosis depression, incorporating it as a central element in the construction of his identity. Two observations were discussed: (a) a precious memory of the contact with a former teacher who served as ‘protected area’ in the client’s self; (b) an increasing opposition between ‘I as depressed’ as a dominant I position and ‘I as a fighter’, an emergent I position in the self. These observations led to the question whether social representations theory takes sufficiently into account the self as a dynamic multiplicity of relatively autonomous parts of a system that is capable of organizing and reorganizing itself.

Key Words: clinical diagnosis • depression • multiplicity of self • opposites • self-positions • social representations theory

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 4, 407-414 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X0394005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
N. Carpentier, F. Ducharme, M.-J. Kergoat, and H. Bergman
Social Representations of Barriers to Care Early in the Careers of Caregivers of Persons With Alzheimer's Disease
Research on Aging, May 1, 2008; 30(3): 334 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
H. Raty, S. Ikonen, and K. Honkalampi
Common-Sense Descriptions of Depression as Social Representations
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 52(3): 243 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
C. Voelklein and C. Howarth
A Review of Controversies about Social Representations Theory: A British Debate
Culture Psychology, December 1, 2005; 11(4): 431 - 454.
[Abstract] [PDF]