Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baerveldt, C.
Right arrow Articles by Verheggen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Enactivism and the Experiential Reality of Culture: Rethinking the Epistemological Basis of Cultural Psychology

Cor Baerveldt

Theo Verheggen

University of Nijmegen

The key problem of cultural psychology comprises a paradox: while people believe they act on the basis of their own authentic experience, cultural psychologists observe their behavior to be socially patterned. It is argued that, in order to account for those patterns, cultural psychology should take human experience as its analytical starting point. Nevertheless, there is a tendency within cultural psychology to either neglect human experience, by focusing exclusively on discourse, or to consider the structure of this experience to originate in an already produced cultural order. For an alternative approach, we turn to the enactive view of cognition developed by Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela. Their theory of autonomy can provide the epistemological basis for a cultural psychology that explains how experience can become socially patterned in the first place. Cultural life forms are then considered as consensually coordinated, embodied practices.

Key Words: cultural psychology • embodiment • enactivism • epistemology • experiential reality

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 2, 183-206 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X9952006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
J. Valsiner
Cultural Psychology Today: Innovations and Oversights
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2009; 15(1): 5 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
T. Verheggen and C. Baerveldt
We Don't Share! The Social Representation Approach, Enactivism and the Ground for an Intrinsically Social Psychology
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2007; 13(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
C. Baerveldt and P. Voestermans
Culture, Emotion and the Normative Structure of Reality
Theory Psychology, August 1, 2005; 15(4): 449 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
A. L. B. Smolka
Cultural Diversity and Theoretical Differences: Perspectives and Difficulties in (Cross-cultural) Psychology
Culture Psychology, December 1, 2000; 6(4): 477 - 494.
[PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
K. Kreppner
Enactivism and Monadology: Where Are Baerveldt and Verheggen Taking the Individual and Cultural Psychology?
Culture Psychology, June 1, 1999; 5(2): 207 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]