Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Overton, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Beyond Dichotomy: An Embodied Active Agent for Cultural Psychology

Willis F. Overton

Temple University, USA

Boesch's developmentally oriented cultural action theory is explored in the context of relational-developmental metatheory. This metatheory provides an avenue for moving beyond either/or debates to an inclusive understanding concerning the nature of developmental change, expressive-constitutive and instrumental-communicative fcunctions of action, and the nature of the person-action-culture relationship. Moving beyond dichotomy in cultural psychology requires taking seriously the notion of embodiment and describing the person of cultural psychology according to the dimension of embodiment, action and agent. Boesch's approach is identified as a concrete instantiation of these interrelated dimensions.

Key Words: action • agent • development • embodiment • metatheory

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 3, 315-334 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X9733006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
C. Cornejo
Review Essay: The Locus of Subjectivity in Cultural Studies
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2007; 13(2): 243 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
R. D. Langhout
Acts of Resistance: Student (In)visibility
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2005; 11(2): 123 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
L. M. Simao
Boesch's Symbolic Action Theory in Interaction
Culture Psychology, December 1, 2001; 7(4): 485 - 493.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
I. E. Josephs
Playful Dancing vs Fighting for Dominance: Towards a Dialogue between Mythos and Logos
Culture Psychology, December 1, 1997; 3(4): 511 - 520.



Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
H. J.M. Hermans
Commonalities in Boesch and Murray: Bridging between a European and an American Thinker
Culture Psychology, September 1, 1997; 3(3): 395 - 404.
[Abstract]