Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckensberger, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Legacy of Boesch's Intellectual Oeuvre

Lutz H. Eckensberger

The German Institute for International Educational Research, Germany

The article serves as an introduction to Boesch's theory from the personal point of view of an author who has interacted with Boesch for a long time. First, three roots of Boesch's enterprise are located (Boesch's clinical work, his interest in contexts, and his own scientific heritage), and their implications for his theoretical framework are drawn. In a second section the intrinsic relationship among some of Boesch's key concepts is illustrated (actor, action, cognitive and affective schemata, symbolism, fantasms and myths). In a third part some thoughts about the future of Boesch's theory are offered. Here it is claimed that in Boesch's theory the social world is not as adequately elaborated as is the world of objects, and that this is a task for the future. Additionally, some methodical and methodological implications are enumerated, which follow from an action theory that is built upon a potentially self-reflective subject who is to be respected also as a moral patient.

Key Words: action • history of science • methodology • methods • symbol

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 3, 277-298 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X9733004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
C. Cornejo
Review Essay: The Locus of Subjectivity in Cultural Studies
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2007; 13(2): 243 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
L. M. Simao
Boesch's Symbolic Action Theory in Interaction
Culture Psychology, December 1, 2001; 7(4): 485 - 493.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
J. Valsiner
The First Six Years: Culture's Adventures in Psychology
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2001; 7(1): 5 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
P. B. Baltes
Ernst E. Boesch at 80: Reflections from a Student on the Culture of Psychology
Culture Psychology, September 1, 1997; 3(3): 247 - 256.
[Abstract]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
U. M. Staudinger
Cultural Psychology and the Art of Life: Some Thoughts on the Work of Ernst E. Boesch
Culture Psychology, September 1, 1997; 3(3): 299 - 314.
[Abstract]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
K. Kreppner
Cultural Psychology and the Problem of Exchange between Individual and Environment: Is There a Common Concept?
Culture Psychology, September 1, 1997; 3(3): 405 - 422.
[Abstract]