Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bang, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Commentary: Building a New House out of Old Materials—and with Sharpened Tools

Jytte Bang

University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Jytte.bang{at}psy.ku.dk

I discuss Eugene Matusov's claim that there is a clash between the cultural-historical paradigm and the sociocultural paradigm within Vygotskian academia. I argue that even though the paradigms may look quite opposite, none of them seem to be based on a dialectical (Hegelian) analysis of culture and on the concreteness of cultural change and development. The lack of dialectics in general tends to lead to mechanical socioculturalism and mechanical ideas of development. The example of headscarves used among Muslims girls and women to gain potentials for action illustrates the dynamic nature of cultural change. It is argued that we need to get beyond a point where the notion of culture is based on philosophical elementarism (so strongly criticized by William James). In general, I argue for an indeterminist-dialectical version of cultural-historical change which, hopefully, will vaporize false dichotomies like `if something is contextual, it cannot be universal'. Thus, for the sake of discussion, I am trying to challenge the way Matsuov presents the problem of `clashes between paradigms' in the first place.

Key Words: context • culture • development • dialectics • elementarism • thinking • universals

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 1, 45-55 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X07085811


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
J. Valsiner
Cultural Psychology Today: Innovations and Oversights
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2009; 15(1): 5 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
E. Matusov
Response: Dialogue with Sociohistorical Vygotskian Academia about a Sociocultural Approach
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2008; 14(1): 81 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]