Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Commentary: The Vygotskian Family in the Supreme Court of Practice

Benjamin S. Bradley

Charles Sturt University, Australia, bbradley{at}csu.edu.au

The unification of psychology has proven a perennial problem. Vygotsky's solution was to reverse the usual predominance of theory over practice, making practice the `supreme judge' of truth. Matusov's goal appears to be a more modest one: the integration of cultural-historical and sociocultural Vygotskians into a harmonious `family'. Analysing the aporias of Matusov's text, I argue that what unites these two groups of Vygotsky's heirs is a common commitment to liberation from oppression and the promotion of equality. Vygotskians thus take their place in a far larger movement of psychologists who share these commitments and apply them not just to theory but to the practice of research, politics and pedagogy. Hence Matusov's argument, despite its paradoxes, ellipses and internal contradictions, has a far larger reach than he implies, but one that turns out to be quite in keeping with Vygotsky's initial proposals for a unified psychology.

Key Words: cultural-historical approach • ethics before science • Hippocratic oath • ontology • reflexiveness • sociocultural approach • the test of practice • unification of psychology

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 1, 37-44 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X07085810


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
E. Matusov
Response: Dialogue with Sociohistorical Vygotskian Academia about a Sociocultural Approach
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2008; 14(1): 81 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]