| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Review Essay: Conceptualizing Metaphors versus Embodying the LanguageKövecses, Zoltán, Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge Universty Press, 2005. ISBN 0—521—84447—9 (hbk)Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, cca{at}puc.cl The paper presents a review of Kövecses's book Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation (2005) advancing a more general critique to the cognitive linguistic view of metaphor. Kövecses addresses a pending problem for the cognitive linguistic approach, namely the observed variation both cross-culturally and within cultures in the use of metaphors. If, as predicted by cognitive linguistics, metaphorical expressions are bodily motivated, conceptual metaphors should be universals. Variation is also a problem for this theory. I argue that the problem reflects the incapacity of the theory to integrate bodily and social meanings. To solve this dilemma, three tenets of cognitive linguistics should be changed: the necessity to hypothesize conceptual structures between body and meaning; the framing of metaphor as a logical device rather than a psychological process; and the omission of the phenomenological experience when using metaphors. I conclude with a brief sketch of how a metaphor theory should work when changing those tenets.
Key Words: conceptual metaphor • embodiment • meaning construction • metaphor • microgenesis
Culture & Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 4,
474-487 (2007) |
||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
