Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Directionality of Development and the Ryoko Model: Reply to Four Commentaries

Yoko Yamada

Kyoto University, Japan

Yoshinobu Kato

Aichi Prefectural University, Japan

Questions about time are fundamentally connected to development. In addition to the Generative Life Cycle Model (GLCM), this article explores a new way of looking at the concept of life-span development. In particular, it examines principal ideas expressed in the Ryoko (Parallel Going) Model, which casts doubts on the Western system of meaning and master narrative of progressivism. For example, Baltes’ multi-dimensional model of life-span development indicates that gain always implies growth and loss implies decline. In contrast, the Ryoko Model is able to handle simultaneous dual changes in opposite and reverse tendencies: a change toward gain implies a change toward loss, and vice versa. This approach allows us to become aware of how opposite meanings can coexist within different perspectives and contexts and to reintroduce the values of ‘loss’ and ‘death’ as positive aspects of human development and the generative cycle of time.

Key Words: life cycle • life-span development • loss • time concept

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 2, 260-272 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X06064595


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
P. van Geert
Time, Models and Narratives: Towards Understanding the Dynamics of Life
Culture Psychology, December 1, 2006; 12(4): 487 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
J. Valsiner
Once Upon a Time... Again
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2006; 12(2): 139 - 141.
[PDF]