| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Psychological Models of Time: Arrows, Cycles and SpiralsUniversity of Victoria, Canada
University of Victoria, Canada This article examines the models of time presented by Yamada and Kato (2006) and Rudolph (2006). Although we agree with Yamada and Kato that the subjective experience of time is not linear and homogeneous, we argue that cyclical models of time are not good models of representing normative ontogenetic development. We also critically examine Rudolphs suggestion that the experience of time is derived from a succession of discrete acts of attention and states of ambivalence that interpolate between the discrete acts of attention.
Key Words: development life-span theory metatheory time
Culture & Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 2,
221-229 (2006) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
