Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudolph, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Fullness of Time

Lee Rudolph

Clark University, USA

In this speculative article, I question the postulation of homogeneity in models of time intended for use in developmental, social or cultural psychology. After surveying extant models, I propose a new kind of model, which is highly inhomogeneous and one-dimensional only in a global sense: locally such a model can be very ‘full’. My aim is to capture in mathematical form one common hypothesis about psychological time (that it reckons ‘acts of attention’), somewhat amplified by a further claim (that these acts are interpolated by states of ambivalence), and to do so precisely enough that the resulting models can be used effectively in further collaborations between mathematicians and psychologists

Key Words: ambivalence • attention • full time • homogeneity • inhomogeneity • one-dimensionality • space • spatial models • time

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 2, 169-204 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X06064577


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
J. Valsiner
Cultural Psychology Today: Innovations and Oversights
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2009; 15(1): 5 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
P. van Geert
Time, Models and Narratives: Towards Understanding the Dynamics of Life
Culture Psychology, December 1, 2006; 12(4): 487 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
J. Valsiner
Once Upon a Time... Again
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2006; 12(2): 139 - 141.
[PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
R. Diriwachter
The Wandering Soul in Relation to Time
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2006; 12(2): 161 - 167.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
E. N. Dzhafarov
Mathematical Theorizing versus Mathematical Metaphorizing: A Commentary on Rudolph
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2006; 12(2): 205 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
W. Thorngate
The Seductive Danger of Visual Metaphors: It's About Time
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2006; 12(2): 215 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
U. Muller and G. F. Giesbrecht
Psychological Models of Time: Arrows, Cycles and Spirals
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2006; 12(2): 221 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
K. E. Hood
Times of Life and Timing in Developmental Psychology
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2006; 12(2): 230 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
L. Rudolph
Mathematics, Models and Metaphors
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2006; 12(2): 245 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
Y. Yamada and Y. Kato
Directionality of Development and the Ryoko Model: Reply to Four Commentaries
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2006; 12(2): 260 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]