Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diriwächter, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Wandering Soul in Relation to Time

Rainer Diriwächter

California Lutheran University, USA

The unidirectional, linear-progressive view of time for psychology may need an overhaul. In this article, I comment upon Yamada and Kato’s (2006) findings and further discuss the underlying axiom that gives time its structure: We stand in relation to things. This relationship is key to understanding the world in which we are embedded. The trajectories of time reveal the course of a particular development, be it the psyche in the historical-cultural temporal context as illustrated through Wilhelm Wundt’s Elemente der Völkerpsychologie (1912), or how certain people conceive of their soul’s voyage through life and death cycles. However, the supposedly ‘observed’ developmental trajectories—of whatever nature they may be—emerge due to our situatedness towards a particular event. In the end, we must remember that time is nothing but an ‘infused’ component of the complex qualities of phenomena, whose Gestalt reveals itself once the researcher’s finite perspective has cut somewhere into the spatio-temporal totality of the objective world

Key Words: development • life cycle • microgenesis • soul • time • Völkerpsychologie

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 2, 161-167 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X06064576


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
P. van Geert
Time, Models and Narratives: Towards Understanding the Dynamics of Life
Culture Psychology, December 1, 2006; 12(4): 487 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
Y. Yamada and Y. Kato
Directionality of Development and the Ryoko Model: Reply to Four Commentaries
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2006; 12(2): 260 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]