This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cornejo, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

To Believe or Not to Believe in Verbal Reports: The Denial of First-Person Authority and the Blind Spot of Universalist Cross-cultural Studies

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

In his paper, David Matsumoto (2005) offers a critical approach to the adequacy of verbal reports as representations of culture, arguing that they represent a cultural ideology (what he calls ‘consensual culture’ or a ‘consensual cultural worldview’) rather than a culture's actual complexity (‘cultural ways’ or ‘actual cultural behaviors’). I agree with the author that we make mistakes when describing our own culture. But the fact that we may sometimes err does not necessarily mean that we always do. The problem with such a view is that the denial of the epistemic value of verbal reports also invalidates the capacities of the scientist as a member of the culture, unless we consider the scientist to exist outside her/his culture. This is the classical objectivist approach in science and, furthermore, the assumption tacitly accepted by cross-cultural studies.

Key Words: anthopological universalism • cross-cultural methodology • etic/emic approaches • verbal report

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 1, 63-67 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X06061593


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?