Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirschner, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘Good Babies’ or ‘Goodness of Fit?’ Normalizing and Pluralizing Dimensions of Contemporary Temperament Discourse

Suzanne R. Kirschner

College of the Holy Cross, USA

This paper explores contemporary discourse on temperamental differences in children in terms of how it embodies a central tension in modern liberal democratic society. This is the tension between normalization (the delineation of forms of behavior and experience that are deemed undesirable, in order to bring normative ideals of personhood into sharper focus), on the one hand, and a commitment to pluralism and the inclusion of diverse modes of experience and being on the other. Through examination of recent texts written for parents and professionals, it is argued that while contemporary North American temperament writings and practices evince normalizing elements, they also contain genuinely ironic and contextualizing features which challenge or attenuate the trend towards an increasing pathologization of various species of personality and behavioral ‘difference’.

Key Words: democracy • difference • goodness of fit • individual differences • normalization • temperament

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 1, 5-31 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X06061591
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Med PhilosHome page
E. F. Cohen and C. P. Morley
Children, ADHD, and Citizenship
J Med Philos, April 1, 2009; 34(2): 155 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]