This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Raudsepp, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Why Is It So Difficult to Understand the Theory of Social Representations?

Tallinn University

Voelklein and Howarth's article characterizes social representations theory (SRT) in the light of criticism from British discursive psychology and focuses on a number of critical issues that are consistently misinterpreted in theoretical interpretations of SRT. I argue that on a more general level, difficulties in proper understanding of SRT stem from its underlying dialectical assumptions. Some critical points related to SRT that are most often misinterpreted are discussed: aggregate and systemic concepts of sociality, individual agency, the role of social practice, among others.

Key Words: agency • semiosphere • social representations • social representations theory • sociality

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 4, 455-468 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X05058587


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Castro and S. Batel Social Representation, Change and Resistance: On the Difficulties of Generalizing New Norms Culture Psychology, December 1, 2008; 14(4): 475 - 497. [Abstract] [PDF]