Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tappan, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Domination, Subordination and the Dialogical Self: Identity Development and the Politics of ‘Ideological Becoming’

Mark B. Tappan

Colby College, USA

In this paper I present an approach to understanding the dialogical self that considers the role that social, cultural and institutional dynamics of domination and subordination, and structures of power of privilege, play in the development of identity. To accomplish this I expand Penuel and Wertsch’s (1995) ‘mediated action’ approach to identity development to include a dialogical process of what Mikhail Bakhtin (1981) calls ‘ideological becoming’. Using the Autobiography of Malcolm X as an illustrative example, I argue that the development of Malcolm’s identity, via the process of ideological becoming, is influenced in profound ways by his experience of subordination and oppression, and his lack of power and privilege, growing up as a black man in the United States in the first half of the 20th century. Thus the ‘politics of ideological becoming’ refers to the degree to which the process of identity formation is necessarily different for persons from different social locations, who stand in different relationship to structures and systems of power, privilege and authority.

Key Words: dialogue • domination • identity • mediated action • self • subordination

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 1, 47-75 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X05050743


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
A. Gillespie
Malcolm X and His Autobiography: Identity Development and Self-narration
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2005; 11(1): 77 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
A. Iborra
Beyond Identity and Ideology: Processes of Transcendence Associated with the Experience of Conversion
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2005; 11(1): 89 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
M. Barcinski and V. Kalia
Extending the Boundaries of the Dialogical Self: Speaking from within the Feminist Perspective
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2005; 11(1): 101 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]