Culture & Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abbey, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Culture & Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 4, 409-415 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X04045743

The Blind Leading the Seeing: A Path to Self-Reflexivity

Emily Abbey

Clark University, USAeabbey{at}clarku.edu

Humans attempt to control the uncertainty of life by creating expectations. The construction of expectations is not foolproof, as uncertainty may be re-created when expectations do not match actualities. Ambiguity resulting from such a mismatch may be approached intolerantly, where individuals may create ‘false clarity’ through dichotomizing—shutting out information that does not match expectations. This intolerant process is particularly problematic when expectations for the self are violated, causing intolerance to be turned inward. In such instances, individuals may shut out aspects of the self that do not fit with expectations. Over many instances, intolerance can create a self that is also more a ‘false clarity’ than a real being. It is suggested that intolerance and the corresponding negative impact on the self can be avoided through the use of minimally binding expectations. Such expectations are hyper-flexible and thwart the construction of ambiguity by accommodating unexpected information rather than rejecting it. The concept of fate is an example of a minimally binding expectation. Bringing fate into meaning-construction about the self limits intolerant processes, thus promoting self-reflexivity. The self becomes less a falsehood created through intolerance and more an authenticity based on tolerance.

Key Words: ambiguity • fate • intolerance • reflexivity • self


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
M. E. Molina and M. T. del Rio
Child Sexual Abuse Interpretation as a Sign-Construction Process
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2007; 13(1): 29 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]