Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Culture & Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moll, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Cultural People and Cultural Contexts: Comments on Cole (1995) and Wertsch (1995)

Ian Moll

University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

The issue of 'cultural relativism' that has framed much of cross-cultural psychology or social and cultural anthropology poses interesting problems which are analysed as triggered by the papers by Cole (1995) and Wertsch (1995). Cultural psychology may benefit from a consistent assertion that people are basically the same, that they have the same basic cognitive processes, despite different forms of cultural experience. This, of course, supposes an ontological distinction between mind and society.

Comparing cultures in terms of manifest performance of persons may be a misguided venture based on essentially unproductive concepts of both mind and culture. In the approach offered here, /culture' becomes conceived as the process that transforms individuals in social, institutional and historical contexts just as much as it is the process whereby individuals transform those contexts; it is the process whereby universal historical constraints make the development of mind possible

Key Words: culture as transformation • generativity • individualism • relativity

Culture & Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 3, 361-371 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X9513003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
E. Matusov
Applying a Sociocultural Approach to Vygotskian Academia: `Our Tsar Isn't Like Yours, and Yours Isn't Like Ours'
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2008; 14(1): 5 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
B. S. Bradley
Commentary: The Vygotskian Family in the Supreme Court of Practice
Culture Psychology, March 1, 2008; 14(1): 37 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]